Publications

@article{Murley2026,

title = {Is neglect different? Social determinants of child protection plans by recorded maltreatment type in England: a longitudinal ecological study, 2014/2015–2022/2023},

author = {Francesca Murley, Nurgul Gecer, Gianmaria Niccodemi, Michelle Black, Katie Fahy, David Taylor-Robinson, Philip McHale and Davara Bennett},

url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/16/8/e119211},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119211},

year  = {2026},

date = {2026-08-05},

urldate = {2026-08-05},

journal = {BMJ Open},

keywords = {child health, Child welfare, Children, Social determinants, Social environment, Social welfare, young people},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Crowley2025,

title = {Machine learning for prediction of childhood mental health problems in social care},

author = {Ryan Crowley, Katherine Parkin, Emma Rocheteau, Emma Rocheteau, Efthalia Massou, Yasmin Friedmann, Ann John, Rachel Sippy, Pietro Liò and Anna Moore},

url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-open/article/machine-learning-for-prediction-of-childhood-mental-health-problems-in-social-care/E302F9B50140D824E8D8A6AE6A2926B8?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=copy_link&utm_source=bookmark},

doi = {doi:10.1192/bjo.2025.32},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-04-11},

urldate = {2025-04-11},

journal = {BJPsych Open },

keywords = {child health, Child welfare, Children, Mental Health, Social welfare, Social work},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Harland2021,

title = {Understanding the life experiences of people with multiple complex needs: peer research in a health needs assessment},

author = {Harland, J.M., Adams, E. A., Boobis, S., Cheetham, M., Wiseman, A. Ramsay, S.E.},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab142},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab142},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-08-26},

journal = {European Journal of Public Health},

keywords = {Children, Health inequalities, homelessness, Housing, Interventions, Mental Health, poverty, Social welfare, substance abuse, young adults},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Beardon2021,

title = { International Evidence on the Impact of Health-Justice Partnerships: A Systematic Scoping Review.},

author = {Beardon, S., Woodhead, C., Cooper, S., Ingram, E., Genn, H. & Raine, R.},

url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1603976},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2021.1603976},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-04-26},

journal = {Public Health Reviews},

volume = {42},

keywords = {health improvement, health justice, health prevention, Social welfare, systematic review},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{E2017,

title = {Using local authority entrance charges to tackle inequalities in physical activity? A qualitative study of leisure and public health perspectives},

author = {Halliday E, Barr B, Higgerson J, Holt V, Ortiz-Nunez A, Ward F. },

url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx124},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx124},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-09-11},

journal = {J Public Health (Oxf). },

volume = {40},

number = {3},

pages = {567-72},

keywords = {Exercise, Physical activity, qualitative research;, Social determinants, Social welfare},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{,

title = {Co- located welfare advice in general practice: A realist qualitative study},

author = {Woodhead C, Collins H, Lomas R, Raine R.},

doi = {10.1111/hsc.12453},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-04-10},

journal = {Health & Social Care in the Community},

abstract = {General practitioners (GPs) engage with patients about a variety of social issues dis-tinct from direct clinical work (“non- health” issues), such as health- related benefits and debt. Co- located welfare advice services could provide support to practices but have usually been considered in terms of patient rather than practice outcomes. We aimed to develop an initial programme theory for how the provision of co- located advice supports specific practice outcomes, and to identify salient barriers and enabling fac-tors. Twenty- four semi- structured interviews with general practice staff, advice staff and service funders in two UK urban localities were conducted between January and July 2016. Data were thematically analysed and a modified Realist Evaluation ap-proach informed the topic guide, thematic analysis and interpretation. Two outcomes are described linked to participant accounts of the impact of such non- health work on practices: reduction of GP consultations linked to non- health issues and reduced prac-tice time spent on non- health issues. We found that individual responses and actions influencing service awareness were key facilitators to each of the practice outcomes, including proactive engagement, communication, regular reminders and feedback be-tween advice staff, practice managers and funders. Facilitating implementation factors were: not limiting access to GP referral, and offering booked appointments and advice on a broader range of issues responsive to local need. Key barriers included pre- existing sociocultural and organisational rules and norms largely outside of the control of service implementers, which maintained perceptions of the GP as the “go- to- location”. We conclude that co- location of welfare advice services alone is unlikely to enable positive outcomes for practices and suggest several factors amenable to inter-vention that could enhance the potential for co- location to meet desired objectives.},

keywords = {GPs, Primary Care, Social welfare, Welfare, Welfare advice},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}